Pengaruh Motivasi Prososial Dan Perilaku Pembinaan Pada Perilaku Kewargaan Organisasional Pada Tim Swakelola
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55264/jumabis.v8i2.158Keywords:
Perilaku Kewargaan Organisasional, Motivasi Proposial, Perilaku Pembinaan, Tim SwakelolaAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh motivasi prososial terhadap perilaku kewargaan organisasional (PKO) dalam tim swakelola, dengan fokus pada peran moderasi perilaku pembinaan pada hubungan ini. Motivasi prososial, yang ditandai dengan keinginan untuk memberi manfaat kepada orang lain di tempat kerja, diusulkan sebagai pendorong signifikan dari PKO, aspek perilaku karyawan yang melampaui tugas pekerjaan yang ditetapkan untuk meningkatkan fungsi organisasi. Melalui survei di berbagai industri di Indonesia, studi ini menyelidiki bagaimana pembinaan dapat memperkuat efek motivasi prososial terhadap PKO. Penelitian ini melibatkan 218 responden dari 55 tim swakelola dari 25 organisasi di Indonesia. Hasil dari uji hipotesis menggunakan hierarchical regression analysis menunjukkan temuan pengaruh positif dan signifikan motivasi prososial terhadap PKO. Selanjutnya, meskipun perilaku pembinaan diharapkan untuk memperkuat hubungan ini, hasilnya penelitian ini tidak mendukung hipotesis kedua. Hal ini menunjukkan kompleksitas faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku kewargaan organisasional di lingkungan organisasi. Studi ini memberikan kontribusi pada pemahaman tentang bagaimana motivasi prososial dapat mempengaruhi dinamika organisasi dan menawarkan wawasan bagi manajer untuk membina lingkungan yang mendukung perilaku kewargaan organisasi yang efektif.References
Arshad, M.; Abid, G.; Torres, F.V.C., 2021, “Impact of prosocial motivation on organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of ethical leadership and leader–member exchange”, Qual. Quant., 55, 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00997-5.
Babic, K., Cerne, M., Connelly, C., Dysvik, A. and Skerlavaj, M., 2019, “Are we in this together? Knowledge hiding in teams, collective prosocial motivation and leader-member exchange”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 1502-1522. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0734.
Bandura, Albert. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice- Hall.
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
Cheung, F.Y.M., Peng, K. and Wong, C.-S., 2018, “Beyond exchange and prosocial motives, is altruistic helping a valid motive for organizational citizenship behavior?”, Chinese Management Studies.
Choi, J. N., & Sy, T. (2010). Group-level organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of demographic faultlines and conflict in small work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7), 1032–1054. DOI: 10.1002/job.661.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Emhan, 2012, “A. Relationship among managerial support, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A comparative study of nonprofit, for-profit and public sectors in Turkey”, Int. J. Bus. Humanit. Technol.
Eva, N., Newman, A., Zhou, A.J. and Zhou, S.S.,2019, “The relationship between ethical leadership and employees’ internal and external community citizenship behaviors”, Personnel Review, Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. 636-652. DOI 10.1108/PR-01-2019-0019.
Gohler, G.-F., Hattke, J. and Gobel, M., 2023, “The mediating role of prosocial motivation in the context of knowledge sharing and self-determination theory”. Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 545-565. DOI 10.1108/JKM-05-2021-0376
Grant, A. M.,2013. Given and take: “A revolutionary approach to success”. New York, NY: Viking Press.
Grant, A. M., & Berg, J. M., 2011, “Prosocial motivation at work: When, why, and how making a difference makes a difference” In K. Cameron and G. Spreitzer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship: 28–44. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Grant, Adam M, & Sumanth, J. J. (2009). Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 927–944. DOI: 10.1037/a0014391.
Hackman, J. R., & Walton, R. E.,1986, “Leading groups in organizations”, In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups: 72–119. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
Hackman, J. R., 1987, “The design of work teams”, In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior: 315–342. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hair, Joseph E. Jr., Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham, & William C. Black. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Ed. Pearson New International Edition, Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Hsu, Y.-P., Chun-Yang, P., Pi-Hui, T., & Ching-Wei, T., 2019, “Managerial coaching, job performance, and team commitment: the meditating effect of psychological capital”, Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 9(5), 101–125.
Hu J, Liden RC., 2015, “Making a difference in the teamwork: linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness”, Acad. Manag. J. 58:1102–27.
Kurtessis, J.N.; Eisenberger, R.; Ford, M.T.; Buffardi, L.C.; Stewart, K.A.; Adis, C.S., 2017, Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. J. Manag., 43, 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554.
Izogo, E.E., Mpinganjira, M. and Ogba, F.N.,2020, “Does the collectivism/individualism cultural orientation determine the effect of customer inspiration on customer citizenship behaviors?”. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. Vol. 43, pp. 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.04.001.
Kozlowski, S.W.J. and Bell, B.S., 2019, “Evidence-based principles and strategies for optimizing team functioning and performance in science teams”, in Strategies for Team Science Success, Springer, East Lansing, Ithaca, pp. 269-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20992-6_21.
Llorente-Alonso, M., García-Ael, C., & Topa, G., 2023, “A metaanalysis of psychological empowerment: Antecedents, organizational outcomes, and moderating variables”, Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04369-8.
Mo, S.; Shi, J., 2017, “Linking ethical leadership to employees’ organizational citizenship behavior: Testing the multilevel mediation role of organizational concern”, J. Bus. Ethics, 141, 151–162. DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2734-x.
Newman, A., Eva, N., Bindl, U.K. & Stoverink, A.C., 2022, “Organizational and vocational behavior in times of crisis: a review of empirical work undertaken during the COVID-19 pandemic and introduction to the special issue”, Applied Psychology, Vol. 71 No. 3, pp. 743-764. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12409.
Rehmat, M.; Abid, G.; Ashfaq, F.; Arya, B.; Farooqi, S., 2020, “Workplace Respect and Organizational Identification: A Sequential Mediation”, Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang.
Rousseau, V., & Aube?, C. (2010). Team self-managing behaviors and team effectiveness: The moderating effect of task routineness. Group & Organization Management. 35, 751-781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110390835.
Shao, D.; Zhou, E.; Gao, P.; Long, L.; Xiong, J., 2019, “Double-edged effects of socially responsible human resource management on employee task performance and organizational citizenship behavior: Mediating by role ambiguity and moderating by prosocial motivation” Sustainability, 11, 2271. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082271.
Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S., 2011, “Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review”. The Journal of Applied Psychology. 96: 981–1003. DOI: 10.1037/a0022676.
Sonnentag, S., Tay, L. and Nesher Shoshan, H., 2023, “A review on health and well-being at work: more than stressors and strains”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 76 No. 2, pp. 473-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12572.
Torfing, J. & Bentzen, T.Ø., 2020, “Does stewardship theory provide a viable alternative to control-fixated performance management?” Administrative Sciences, 10, 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040086.
Xia, Z. and Yang, F. 2020. Ethical leadership and knowledge sharing: the impacts of prosocial motivation and two facets of conscientiousness, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 11, p. 581236. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581236.
